SOUTH AFRICA'S TV WEBSITE
SIGN IN SEARCH MENU
SOUTH AFRICA'S TV WEBSITE


Five reasons why the SABC and e.tv clearly have an anti sci-fi policy

Written by TVSA Team from the blog 5 Reasons on 30 Jul 2007
Favourite this post


Fans of science fiction who have DSTV do quite well, as ActionX certainly caters for their needs. However, those like me who don’t have DSTV have to suffer with what the SABC and e.tv dish up, and they don't dish up much.

In fact, I’m convinced that they have an anti sci-fi policy. If you don’t believe me, here are five reasons which should bring you around to my way of thinking.

1) They show very little in the way of sci-fi

In the 15 months of TVSA’s existence, there have been four sci-fi shows on free to air television: Charlie Jade, Charmed, Smallville and Heroes. That’s four shows across four channels, which is hardly a good return.  It’s even worse when you consider that none of those shows were on e.tv. 

I don’t have any records of what was on in terms of sci-fi before TVSA started, but I’m willing to bet that it was precious little.  But if that's not enough to convince you, I have more reasons.

2) They have a history of choosing poor timeslots

In the past, the SABC has been guilty of broadcasting sci-fi shows as part of their children’s line-up in the afternoon. I’m not talking about shows like Lois and Clark, Xena, and Hercules, which while not strictly children’s shows are less serious, and maybe not ideal for a primetime slot.

What I’m talking about are shows like Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, Space: Above and Beyond, and Sliders. All three of those were broadcast as children’s shows (although Deep Space Nine did move for later seasons), and yet none of them were ever intended to be children’s shows.

I was fortunate to be at school and university while those shows were on, and so was able to get home in time to watch them. But by putting them on in the afternoon, you’re actually excluding the main target audience, that of adult sci-fi fans.

But while they seem to have been cured of that affliction, there still is a tendency to pick poor timeslots for sci-fi. Just take a look at the shows I mentioned in point 1.

Charlie Jade was on at 21h00 on a Sunday evening, which is in the middle of the evening movies on SABC1, e.tv and M-Net. Up against that competition, it was never going to attract that many viewers on a consistent basis.

Smallville is currently on at 18h30 on a Saturday.  I don't know what the thinking behind that timeslot  was, but it's hardly an one for a popular show.

While SABC3 scored a coup in bringing us Heroes, they put it up against WWE, which is consistently the most popular show on e.tv.  While it could be argued that they’re trying to attract viewers away from e.tv, I’m not inclined to be that charitable, and a better timeslot would have resulted in more viewers.

3) They ignore the fact that people watch sci-fi shows

Despite the poorly-chosen timeslots, people are watching Smallville and Heroes. Before Erfsondes started, Smallville was the most-watched drama on SABC2, and it attracted more viewers than any drama on SABC3.

While Heroes is never going to attract that many viewers as a result of it being up against WWE and Generations, it’s still managed to attract 25% more viewers than Hard Copy, the show it replaced. That’s definitely a significant increase.

So there definitely is an audience for sci-fi. Imagine how well Smallville and Heroes would have done in better timeslots (actually, in Smallville's case you don’t need to imagine as it did even better in its old timeslot of 19h30 on a Wednesday).

4) They don’t broadcast the complete run of some shows

Star Trek: The Next Generation, Star Trek: Deep Space Nine, Star Trek: Voyager, and Farscape are all shows that the SABC has broadcast. They’re also all shows that ended a number of years ago. They also happen to be shows for which the SABC never bothered to show the later seasons.

While it’s maybe a bit unreasonable to expect the SABC to show back-to-back seasons of a particular show, it’s not unreasonable to expect them to show the complete run of a show. So that’s yet another disservice done to sci-fi fans by the SABC.  I also have a vague memory of them going from Season 1 to Season 3 of Deep Space Nine (ie skipping Season 2), but I can't confirm this.

I can’t criticise e.tv in this regard, as they did show all five seasons of
Babylon 5. However, this doesn’t take away from the fact that they haven’t shown much else in the way of sci-fi.

5) It’s not as if there aren’t shows available

One counter to my first point could be that DSTV has the money to snap up all the good shows. While to some extent this is true, that’s actually not a valid excuse.

ActionX hasn’t been in existence all that long, and the SABC has a history of ignoring shows. A case in point would be Babylon 5, which was ignored by the SABC and ended up being shown by e.tv a number of years after it began in America.

And what’s stopping the SABC from broadcasting sci-fi shows that have already been on DSTV/M-Net? They have a history of doing this – look at Desperate Housewives, CSI, Two and a Half Men, Joey, and the Gilmore Girls to name a few.

Not to mention Smallville, which is a sci-fi show. So what’s stopping SABC from showing Battlestar Galactica or the 4400?

And ActionX doesn't have every show. I haven’t kept close tabs on what sci-fi shows are out there that haven’t reached our screens yet, but I can think of four examples off the top of my head.

Doctor Who (the first season might have been shown on DSTV, but the subsequent ones definitely haven't been)
Torchwood (Doctor Who spinoff)
Jericho
Life on Mars (maybe technically not sci-fi, but it does include a time travel twist)

Maybe some of these shows have been picked up by DSTV, but if not, then why hasn’t the SABC gone for them?

5a) Their advertising for sci-fi shows sucks

I didn’t want to include this as a main point, as I don’t remember how well shows have been advertised in the past, but the SABC’s advertising of their two current sci-fi shows leaves a lot to be desired.  For example, I don’t recall having seen a single promo for the current season of Smallville

When it comes to Heroes, the promos for Heroes fall into two categories – spoiling important plot points or showing scenes from past episodes. It’s almost as though SABC3 doesn’t want people watching it.


So to sum it up - SABC and e.tv show very few sci-fi shows, despite them being available, and when they do they don't take it seriously.  What more evidence do you need as proof of their anti sci-fi policy?



10 Comments

Dimago
30 Jul 2007 05:11

Nice one Citanul. 

I think its a lack of research on part of SABC. They are just concentrating on showing SA stories, they forget that there is a whole other market out there...

Shakes
30 Jul 2007 05:59

I remain puzzled by a lot of the logic behind the shows they do broadcast. While there are gems there like Survivor, TAR, Heroes and America's Next Top Model, for the rest, there aren't that many quality shows I'd be interested in, not to mention sci-fi shows specifically.

Thank goodness for Action x, who are doing quite well IMO. I'd really love a rebroadcast anywhere of the 4400 and Battlestar Galactica (from season 1) since I missed these. I'll probably have to get them on DVD though. *sigh*

Irene
30 Jul 2007 06:26

"Smallville is currently on at 18h30 on a Saturday. I don't know what the thinking behind that timeslot was, but it's hardly an one for a popular show." Agree totally especially on the Smallville bit - someone must've been mental when they made that decision and then I'm not even talking about Heroes (where do they get these times - maybe they should visit TVSA once in a while to get updated info on their competition's show times).  I really had to beg my husband so that I can watch Heroes - he's a big wresting fan. We got to a compromise.  His show will be taped while I could watch mine ;-) Guess I won that battle.

nonkez
30 Jul 2007 06:27

I THINK EVERYTHING PLAYING ON SABC1 IS SCI FI

Dimago
30 Jul 2007 06:46

LOL @ nonkez!!! hihi hi ROFL!!!! LMAO!!!! Yho, thats hilarious...

Toxic
30 Jul 2007 08:23

For example, I don’t recall having seen a single promo for the current season of Smallville 

Until this moment, I didn't even know that Smallville wasn't on MNET!!

Tashi
30 Jul 2007 08:41

Some good news Cit!  I know it doesn't make up for all the shows they haven't brought us but SABC3's got Jericho -  it's gonna be replacing Heroes when it's finished.

Re Dr Who -yes-yes, it hasn't been on anywhere yet and it's a must-have for either e or SABC - Monday, Wednesday or Thursday nights at 19h30 would be the perfect time for it.

six
30 Jul 2007 08:51

>>SABC3's got Jericho - it's gonna be replacing Heroes when it's finished. <<

That's great news TAshi, I hear that Jericho is really good!!!

Citanul
30 Jul 2007 09:00

>>Some good news Cit! I know it doesn't make up for all the shows they haven't brought us but SABC3's got Jericho - it's gonna be replacing Heroes when it's finished.<<

W00t!  That's great news Tashi.  You're right in that it doesn't make up for the past, but maybe things are looking up.

>>Re Dr Who -yes-yes, it hasn't been on anywhere yet and it's a must-have for either e or SABC - Monday, Wednesday or Thursday nights at 19h30 would be the perfect time for it.<<

We've got a page for it, so I wasn't sure whether it had been on or not.  It's surprising that SABC3 hasn't shown it considering that they've had a number of British shows in the past.

kromoz
30 Jul 2007 16:59

Star Trek did not work on SABC3 as it was shown at either 5pm or 6pm on a Saturday afternoon, and considering it has a male slanted demographic, do they honestly think the average SA male was going to drop M-Net's match of the day to watch Star Trek.
It is actually very strange that SciFi seems to attract the masses on the big screen, but it is ignored on the small screen.

I am one of the biggest SciFi fans. I spent R6000 on Dstv in the early days to get the SciFi channel, but these days I like my SciFi in Widescreen, as it should be.
Does anyone else who has seen Heroes through "dubious sources" think that the quality of the broadcast compared to the forementioned "dubious sources" looks crap. The colours are washed out, and again it is not in Widescreen.
Don't worry ... I have my Heroes DVDs on order to cleanse myself of guilt.
At least actionX is making some headway into Widescreen.


Only TVSA members can reply to this thread. Click here to login or register.






LATEST ARTICLES

New on TV today: Tuesday 30 April

New drama Juffrou X debuts on kykNET and Lil Jon Wants to Do What? 2 begins on HGTV.


Oppenheimer movie on M-Net: time, controversy, trailer

Includes impressions from Japanese voices.


kykNET & Kie's new primetime schedule from 7 May 2024

Diepe Waters, Binnelanders and Moederhart change times in the build-up to the channel's new 19h30 local novela.


Beyond Love Teasers - May 2024

The serial killer strikes again, targeting Shivani, Yashvardhan's sister.


Evil Affairs Teasers - May 2024

Nikki faces danger in a daunting cave to fulfil the next ritual.


My Brother's Keeper 2 Teasers - May 2024

The impact of Fakazile's decision has impact and the brothers are at odds.


Champions Teasers - May 2024

Lebo learns things about Emily that begin to scare him.


Umkhokha: The Curse 2 Teasers - May 2024

Khulekani gets a primetime TV offer and MaMzobe continues her journey of repentance. Who will forgive her?


New on TV today: Monday 29 April

CBS Justice reveals Secrets of a Murder Detective and DiepCity begins a run on Wethu.


Arendsvlei Teasers - May 2024

Lee-Roy knows he'll never find peace until he opens the package.

LATEST SITE ACTIVITY


More activity at TVSA Central



LATEST SOAPIE TEASERS



LATEST SOAPIE TEASERS




5 Reasons Contributors:

alex
andi01
babyjoe
belz
Beyonce
Brown Shuga
Cande-girl
Citanul
cocktail
Dimago
Direre
Gugs
Jordan
KeleFabulous
Lindy
Lingo
lsg.com
Michluv
Peachy
Segololo
Shakes
Six
toodecent
Toxic
Vero
Xhosa Chick

×
×

You browser doesn't have Flash, Silverlight, Gears, BrowserPlus or HTML5 support.